Skip to content
  • X

Subscribe

Magazine | Newsletters
  • Food & Drink
  • News
  • Culture
  • Style
  • Home
  • Family
  • Wellness
  • Things to Do
  • Travel
  • Best of NoVA
  • Best Restaurants
  • Top High Schools
  • Best Salons & Spas Poll
  • In This Issue
  • Home
    • News
  • How the Potential End of Roe V. Wade Is Already Affecting Northern Virginia
judge with gavel
  • News

How the Potential End of Roe V. Wade Is Already Affecting Northern Virginia

From Politico to Supreme Court protests, the region is caught up in the turmoil.

By Laura Scudder May 4, 2022 at 2:50 pm

A Supreme Court draft opinion that would overturn Roe v. Wade was made public on Monday. The opinion, which shows that the Court voted to strike down the 1973 landmark case which guaranteed federal protection for abortion rights, was written by Justice Samuel Alito, and has already created an uproar following its release.  

Chief Justice John Roberts said in a statement on Tuesday that the Supreme Court is launching an investigation of the leak. 

The controversy is close to home for Northern Virginians. POLITICO, which broke the news, is housed in Arlington. Following the news and subsequent vitriol about the publication’s source, POLITICO has upped security and restricted office access and internal memos have advised staff to be cautious. 

Pro-choice protesters also gathered outside the Court on Monday night, and protests grew at courthouses and state capitols across the country, with more potentially in the works. 

Currently, Virginia law allows for abortion in the pregnancy’s first trimester, and certain standards have to be met when performing an abortion in the second trimester. If Roe is officially overturned, these laws will still remain the same. 

“States are the battleground for reproductive rights. I passed Virginia’s Reproductive Health Protection Act removing medically unnecessary barriers to abortion, making Virginia the first southern state to expand access. I will fight to keep Virginia a safe haven for abortion,” Virginia Senator Jennifer McClellan said in a tweet.

There isn’t any legislative action pursuing the enactment of some sort of abortion ban following the leak (which is already happening in other states), but it is not out of the question. 

The Washington Post reported that Gov. Glenn Youngkin says he cannot speculate on a particular legislative agenda regarding a 15- or 20-week abortion ban until a final decision on Roe is made, but that he believes the abortion laws should be up to the states. 

“I believe that the state should be able to take on this responsibility. I do believe, just like in determining what our education budget should be, what our funding for law enforcement should be, how we handle our taxes at the state level — those are state decisions,” he says.

Though he distanced himself from the issue on the campaign trail, Youngkin’s own position on abortion is clear. He is pro-life and participated in an antiabortion march at the end of April. 

While Youngkin and other Republican leaders in the state have backed a reversal of Roe (but a condemnation of the leak of the draft opinion), Virginia Democrats, like McClellan, have had the opposite reaction, with Del. Eileen Filler-Corn stressing the importance of a Democratic majority to keep abortion access in place in the Commonwealth. 

In addition to politicians, the leaked draft opinion has fired up Virginia organizations, both pro-life and pro-choice. While organizations like The Family Foundation are awaiting a final Roe reversal, others are prepared to push for safe abortion access. 

“We have been preparing for this, and we’re ready for this fight. Abortion is still legal and will remain legal in Virginia when this decision becomes final. We are prepared to continue to fight across the country—this will not stop us,” the Virginia Reproductive Equity Alliance said. 

They continued, “It is essential that pregnant people have access to medically accurate information and compassionate health care throughout their pregnancy, without political interference. Full stop. Politicians and Supreme Court Justices are throwing up barriers to abortion access not because it is necessary, but because they want to control people’s bodies.”

Feature image, stock.adobe.com

For more stories like this, subscribe to our Local News newsletter.

Trending in NoVA

Thompson Restaurants Takes the Helm of L’Auberge Chez François in Great Falls

Fredericksburg’s Belvedere Plantation Owners Confirm Data Center Plans

16 September Events in Northern Virginia and Washington, DC

Big Dig of Northern Virginia Returns to Ashburn

25 Years Later: NoVA Residents Share Firsthand Accounts of 9/11

things to do newsletter

Our Top Stories In Your Inbox

Our newsletters delivered weekly.

Subscribe

Feeds

RSS Feed Follow in Feedly

You May Also Like

a rendering of the arch President Trump plans to build in DC

NoVA Daily: Triumphal Arch Construction Update, 14 New Restaurants in NoVA

a rendering of the arch President Trump plans to build in DC

Construction to Begin Soon on DC Triumphal Arch

Dulles Town Center

StageCoach Theatre Is Moving from Ashburn to Dulles Town Center

  • X

Company

  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Writer’s Guidelines
  • Internships
  • Terms of Use

Magazine

  • Magazine
  • Subscription
  • Newsletter
  • Back Issues

Talk to Us

  • Contact Us
  • Submit an Event
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Shopping

  • Subscription
  • Back Issues
  • Plaques
  • Realtor Client Gift Subscriptions

On Newsstands Now

september 2026 cover

Copyright © 2026 Northern Virginia Magazine

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. Hey AI.